<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
         xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
         xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">




    



<channel rdf:about="http://american.com/topics/science-technology/RSS">
  <title>Science &amp; Technology</title>
  <link>http://american.com</link>
  
  <description>
    
       Innovation and its consequences.
       
  </description>
  
  
  
            <syn:updatePeriod>daily</syn:updatePeriod>
            <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
            <syn:updateBase>2007-03-29T16:41:19Z</syn:updateBase>
        
  
  <image rdf:resource="http://american.com/logo.jpg"/>

  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://american.com/archive/2010/march/when-to-doubt-a-scientific-consensus"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://american.com/archive/2010/march/what-role-for-geoengineering"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://american.com/archive/2010/february/the-quiet-energy-revolution"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://american.com/archive/2010/january/the-green-con-job"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://american.com/archive/2009/december-2009/supreme-climate-folly"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://american.com/archive/2009/december-2009/the-meaning-of-motley-cru"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://american.com/archive/2009/november/give-thanks-for-this-harvest"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://american.com/archive/2009/november/wherefore-art-thou-green-obama"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://american.com/archive/2009/november/the-quiet-yet-historic-death-of-the-kyoto-protoco"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://american.com/archive/2009/october/coase-vs-the-neo-progressives"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://american.com/archive/2009/october/bleeding-biotech"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://american.com/archive/2009/october/the-copenhagen-climate-extortion"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://american.com/archive/2009/october/green-revolution-in-the-balance"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://american.com/archive/2009/september/how-to-think-about-net-neutrality"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://american.com/archive/2009/august/drake2019s-world"/>
        
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>

</channel>

    <item rdf:about="http://american.com/archive/2010/march/when-to-doubt-a-scientific-consensus">        <title>When to Doubt a Scientific ‘Consensus’</title>        <link>http://american.com/archive/2010/march/when-to-doubt-a-scientific-consensus</link>        <description>Anyone who has studied the history of science knows that scientists are not immune to the non-rational dynamics of the herd.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Jay Richards</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>science-technology</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2010-03-15T21:35:14Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>BernArticle</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://american.com/archive/2010/march/what-role-for-geoengineering">        <title>What Role for Geoengineering?</title>        <link>http://american.com/archive/2010/march/what-role-for-geoengineering</link>        <description>Any effective climate strategy will have to rely upon a combination of emissions reductions, adaptation, and, if circumstances warrant (as appears likely), some degree of geoengineering.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Samuel Thernstrom</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>science-technology</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2010-03-04T20:01:39Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>BernArticle</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://american.com/archive/2010/february/the-quiet-energy-revolution">        <title>The Quiet Energy Revolution</title>        <link>http://american.com/archive/2010/february/the-quiet-energy-revolution</link>        <description>How ironic that during the ‘drill, baby, drill’ demonstrations as gasoline prices spiked in 2007 and 2008, a silent revolution with natural gas was already underway that will make those concerns largely irrelevant. </description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Max Schulz</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>science-technology</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2010-02-03T22:28:31Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>BernArticle</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://american.com/archive/2010/january/the-green-con-job">        <title>The Green Con Job</title>        <link>http://american.com/archive/2010/january/the-green-con-job</link>        <description>The U.S. economy is sensitive to high energy prices. An aggressive push toward green power would result in the net loss of millions of jobs. There is a better way forward. </description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Dustin Chambers and Dan Ervin</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>science-technology</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2010-01-12T23:17:45Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>BernArticle</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://american.com/archive/2009/december-2009/supreme-climate-folly">        <title>Supreme Climate Folly</title>        <link>http://american.com/archive/2009/december-2009/supreme-climate-folly</link>        <description>The Supreme Court, which jealously guards against any hint of a religious symbol on public property lest it establish a religion, has gone a long way toward making the Earth Cult the official religion of the United States. </description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>James V. DeLong</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>science-technology</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-12-18T15:13:22Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>BernArticle</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://american.com/archive/2009/december-2009/the-meaning-of-motley-cru">        <title>The Meaning of Motley CRU</title>        <link>http://american.com/archive/2009/december-2009/the-meaning-of-motley-cru</link>        <description>It’s time for climate science to clean house. Whatever investigations come of Climategate, they should not stop with the United Kingdom.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Kenneth P. Green</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>science-technology</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-12-03T15:09:29Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>BernArticle</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://american.com/archive/2009/november/give-thanks-for-this-harvest">        <title>Give Thanks for This Harvest</title>        <link>http://american.com/archive/2009/november/give-thanks-for-this-harvest</link>        <description>Nobody but we farmers celebrates a great crop like this one. The rest of America should celebrate, and be grateful for the abundance that agriculture provides. </description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Blake Hurst</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>science-technology</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-11-24T23:01:55Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>BernArticle</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://american.com/archive/2009/november/wherefore-art-thou-green-obama">        <title>Wherefore Art Thou, Green Obama</title>        <link>http://american.com/archive/2009/november/wherefore-art-thou-green-obama</link>        <description>Those hoping for a green jolt to the economy must come to grips with three serious misconceptions.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Jon Entine</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>science-technology</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-11-20T22:28:01Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>BernArticle</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://american.com/archive/2009/november/the-quiet-yet-historic-death-of-the-kyoto-protoco">        <title>The Quiet Death of the Kyoto Protocol</title>        <link>http://american.com/archive/2009/november/the-quiet-yet-historic-death-of-the-kyoto-protoco</link>        <description>Reading the climate news in recent weeks, one might start to wonder who won the last election.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Samuel Thernstrom</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>science-technology</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-11-06T14:36:30Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>BernArticle</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://american.com/archive/2009/october/coase-vs-the-neo-progressives">        <title>Coase vs. the Neo-Progressives</title>        <link>http://american.com/archive/2009/october/coase-vs-the-neo-progressives</link>        <description>Fifty years ago this month a seminal paper challenged the prevailing intellectual orthodoxy on markets, technology, and regulation. We would be wise to revisit it today. </description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Jeff Eisenach and Adam Thierer</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>economic-policy</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-10-27T21:22:19Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>BernArticle</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://american.com/archive/2009/october/bleeding-biotech">        <title>Bleeding Biotech </title>        <link>http://american.com/archive/2009/october/bleeding-biotech</link>        <description>Given all the hopes for medical progress that ride on biotech progress, one might assume that Congress and the administration would seek ways to encourage investment. One would be wrong. </description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>James V. DeLong</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>science-technology</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-10-23T21:24:55Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>BernArticle</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://american.com/archive/2009/october/the-copenhagen-climate-extortion">        <title>The Copenhagen Climate Extortion</title>        <link>http://american.com/archive/2009/october/the-copenhagen-climate-extortion</link>        <description>Going into the Copenhagen climate change summit, the delegates appear to be competing over who can offer the most ambitious and least realistic targets.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Jon Entine</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>science-technology</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-10-23T02:23:10Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>BernArticle</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://american.com/archive/2009/october/green-revolution-in-the-balance">        <title>Green Revolution in the Balance</title>        <link>http://american.com/archive/2009/october/green-revolution-in-the-balance</link>        <description>A battle is developing over food security and research into bio-engineered crops is in the crosshairs.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Jon Entine</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>science-technology</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-10-02T20:43:42Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>BernArticle</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://american.com/archive/2009/september/how-to-think-about-net-neutrality">        <title>How to Think About Net Neutrality</title>        <link>http://american.com/archive/2009/september/how-to-think-about-net-neutrality</link>        <description>History suggests the best course is not to borrow trouble, as the old phrase goes, but to let the system 'develop itself in its own way,' and act only in response to actual problems.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>James V. DeLong</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>science-technology</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-09-27T14:43:58Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>BernArticle</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://american.com/archive/2009/august/drake2019s-world">        <title>Drake’s World</title>        <link>http://american.com/archive/2009/august/drake2019s-world</link>        <description>On this day 150 years ago—August 27, 1859—Colonel Edwin Drake struck oil in Titusville, Pennsylvania, with the world’s first oil well. We should all say a toast of thanks to the man who helped raise the curtain on the modern world.
</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Max Schulz</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2009-08-26T21:52:43Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>BernArticle</dc:type>    </item>




</rdf:RDF>
